NAGO Assessment:
1. Must be Peaceful, Respectful and Fully Law Abiding (#1 Rule of NAGO) – Not to be confused with complying to tyrannical or overreaching law.
PASS.
2. Supports and Participates in NAGO Calls to Action
FAIL.
3. Supports Individual Freedoms
FAIL. Dan has made no public comments on individual freedoms.
4. Supports and Participates with Liberty Minded NE Grassroots Efforts – Team Player
FAIL. NAGO could find do information that would show that Dan participates in any grassroots efforts.
5. Attends Local Meetings
PASS. Dan has attended a few local GOP meetings for his district. He stays briefly to be seen and then leaves.
6. Presents a Sense of Patriotism
FAIL. NAGO could find no indication the Dan has a sense of patriotism.
7. Outspoken/Well-spoken on Inalienable Rights
FAIL. Information on Dan’s views of inalienable rights could not be found.
8. Doesn’t Cater to False Narratives
FAIL. Dan is endorsed by other elected officials (Deb Fischer & Regent Rob Schaffer) who do cater to false narratives, if Dan feels differently, no evidence could be found.
9. Acts/Serves/Talks/Promises in the Best Interest of Others – Type of Leader
FAIL. Dan ran for his first term (2016) on the promise to bring broadband to rural areas, at this time, little success can be claimed by him in this area.
10. Prior Involvement/Achievements in Liberty Minded Efforts or Government
FAIL. As previously stated he has made little effort to be present or active in Nebraska grassroots efforts.
SCORE: 2/10
Summary of Candidate
Overall, Dan seems to be a well liked individual but when hard questions were asked and research was done to find out if Dan was a strong patriot who defends individual liberties, no evidence could be found. He appears to stay close to home and participate in local long standing non profits, not branching out to other needs that encompass political issues.
Pertinent Evidence & Observations
Dan’s website and Facebook page are not current since 2018/2019.
***Updates may occur in the future.
